Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Jealousy vs. Protection

Greetings all,

Picture this – a fairly new D/s couple are at a play party. Let us say that they have been together for perhaps a year or less, but feel very committed to each other. She has begged his collar, and he has accepted. Their relationship has been going along very well, and both are satisfied with each other.

At the party, the Dominant partner (let us call him Bill) is approached by another Dominant (whom we shall call Frank). Conversation ensues. Over the course of the conversation Frank extends many positive comments about Bill’s girl (let us call her Susan). Bill is flattered, of course. After a little while Frank asks Bill if he may play with Susan. This is the first time Bill has ever had anyone request this sort of thing. He asks Frank what he means by “playing”. Bill responds that it means both S&M play as well as some sexual play, perhaps a blow job or some such thing.

Bill refuses. At this point Frank says something like “If you were a real Dom you would share her” or “You must be very insecure” or “It is obvious to me that you don’t really own her” or something to this effect. Bill replies that Susan is not ready to play with others, and that she is under his protection, so she will not play with anyone else.

Susan says nothing, though perhaps there is a small glint of excitement in her eyes at the thought of being used by another. Or perhaps it is fear.

So here’s the question: Is Bill being possessive and jealous, or is he being responsible and protective? And, how can we tell the difference, or in particular, how can Bill tell the difference?

To my way of thinking only Bill can really answer this question. Only he is aware of his internal state of mind, and therefore he is the only one who can have any real idea of what the truth is here. Yet, if he is feeling insecure and jealous it is highly unlikely that he will admit this to anyone else. He may even hide it from himself. Therefore we need a more objective way to determine the root cause for his decision.

Let us step back for a minute and consider why the dominant partner in a relationship might choose, or not choose, to share his girl with another. To be clear, when I speak about sharing, this would involve having his submissive serve another in a sexual, service, or play session (or a combination of all three), which may be done privately, or in public. What defines it as sharing is that a) another will use her in a manner which is generally reserved for her dominant partner; and b) this use will be of fixed duration and probably have some hard limits associated with it. The Dominant partner may, or may not, be present during this shared time.

Why might a Dominant be motivated to share his girl? A number of reasons suggest themselves. Perhaps he feels she is ready for a new experience. Often, in the development of a submissive these sorts of experiences can be very helpful, particularly when there is a romantic attachment between Dominant and submissive. By sharing the girl, she is given an opportunity to evaluate the difference between being handled by a lover, as opposed to someone who is only interested in her service.

Another reason for sharing is that it may allow the submissive to be trained in ways in which the Dominant does not have experience. Or, it may be as simple as allowing the submissive to experience certain sensations which are normally not part of how the couple interacts. (I am thinking here of certain forms of extreme sensation play which require a fair amount of experience before attempting to do.)

The Dominant might choose to share his girl strictly to stroke his own ego. Perhaps he wants the other fellow to see the quality of his girl. Many fellows will allow a friend to try their new car, or perhaps a new shop tool. Why not one’s girl?

Or, it might simply please the Dominant to see his girl squirming under the hand of another. Some people find this quite exciting.

The Dominant might do it simply as a technique to show the girl that he is not that attached to her. By allowing another to enjoy her intimate services, he lets her know that she is nothing more than a “girl” to him.

Of course, not all the reasons are positive. A Dominant might give in to peer pressure. He might be unsure of himself and allow himself to be coerced. He might be angry with her and use sharing as a form of punishment. He might even be trying to end their relationship and is sharing her in the hopes that she will find someone else.

OTOH – why might a Dominant choose not to share a girl under his protection?

Firstly, it might be because he is being responsible. Perhaps she is not yet ready for such a thing (if ever). Perhaps he is concerned that her nervousness will lead to her failing and he does not wish to set her up for failure. Perhaps she does not yet reflect his idea of perfection and until she does, he is reluctant for others to experience her.

Perhaps he knows enough about her past and history to know she will not react well to being shared. Perhaps he is concerned that the other Dominant may not be responsible in handling his property.

Perhaps he is worried about her safety.

Or perhaps it simply doesn’t please him to share her at this time.

All well and good, but of course there are other reasons as well.

A classic reason would be insecurity, the root of all jealousy. Simply put, the Dominant is fearful that if he shares her, she will like the other fellow better and want to leave their relationship. Or, he feels that by sharing her, somehow their relationship will be made less special. Or, he is intimidated by the other Dominant, and doesn’t want to look bad in front of him.

As you can see, the generally negative reasons are always based around fear and insecurity. The generally positive reasons are based around responsibility, development, and empowerment. All Dominants really know their own motivation, regardless of whether they admit to it or not.

Protection of the submissive, in all its forms, always results in the girl feeling safe and empowered. Jealousy and insecurity, in all its forms, always blocks development and empowerment. I believe a submissive has the right (and perhaps the duty) to respectfully question her Dominant any time she feels he is doing something out of fear or insecurity, rather than a desire for her protection and development.

It is a tricky question, but one that I feel can be answered only if we are honest with ourselves.





7 comments:

Vesta said...

I think you argued your point of view well here.

I think my dominant was astute enough to see that by allowing me a mentor to teach me things (sometimes you learn some things better from another) he was empowering me and protecting our very strong union at the same time. It was the responsible and the right thing to do and I'm grateful for his sense of responsibility towards my wellbeing.

Having said that, I don't envision a day when he would share me in a physical way. I strongly doubt that would do either of us any good.

For others it may be different and as long as there is understanding and consultation between the couple, I accept your argument. I'm not comfortable with the idea of the submissive not feeling consulted about this but rather given a directive, if that is what you are suggesting.

I would make the proviso to the 'jealousy v protection' argument however that for some couples the right decision is that intimacy remains just between the two of them. There is nothing necessarily wrong with that decision even if feelings of jealousy are part of the reasoning.

I am not sure that we can say that 'jealousy' is inherently bad. I'm still thinking about that but I know if I saw my husband adoring another woman I'd be overwhelmed with jealousy and could hardly blame him if he felt the same way in such circumstances.

I'd love to see more discussion and comments re this subject.It is an important topic and one that takes time and thought to absorb and consider.

David said...

It seems that inherent in this discussion is the notion that a man ought to be willing to share his woman with another, particularly because she is submissive? And that if he is not, then there is one of two or three things wrong with either him,subbilog or the relationship?

Perhaps the answer to my question is embodied in:
The generally positive reasons are based around responsibility, development, and empowerment.
and
Protection of the submissive, in all its forms, always results in the girl feeling safe and empowered.

Mackenzie Cross said...

Greetings Vesta,

Thank you for your comments.

Your partner is certainly free to do as he wishes. You are correct in saying that each couple must find their own path.

As to "consulting the submissive" in advance, I think we are in agreement, depending on the nature of the relationship. If hard limits have been negotiated in advance then they must be respected. However, if the submissive has surrendered, or taken the collar, or whatever one might wish to label it, then I do not see why consultation would be required.

IAE, I would contend that there is nothing of any particular value in the emotion of jealousy. Except perhaps to act as a personal red flag, letting one know that there are some issues which must be dealt with, and the sooner the better.

I found the example of your husband to be inappropriate. The topic has to do with the feelings of protection/jealousy that a Dominant might feel towards their Submissive, not the other way around. My understanding is that your husband is your Dominant, yes?

Submissive jealousy is a different topic. Thank you for reminding me. It sounds like a good idea for a blog entry.

Each couple must find their own way, but to harbour these feelings and not have a way to resolve them is a bad idea.

Thank you again for your response. It was much appreciated.

MC

Mackenzie Cross said...

Greetings David,

Thank you for your note.

I think I have been unclear. Certainly it was not my intent to imply that choosing not to share one's submissive implies some sort of failing in a Dominant's character.

All I am saying, is that if the Dominant can admit to himself that he has feelings of jealousy (and that's a big if), then they should be examined and dealt with.

In the end, if it is both his pleasure, and his responsibility, to keep his girl for himself, then so be it.

You hit the nail right on the head with those two quotes. The only thing I might add is that the pleasure of the Dominant must be balanced somehow against his responsibilities. It is finding and maintaining this balance that is, I believe, one the hallmarks of great D/s relationships.

MC

David said...

Thank you for your clarifying response. I was suspecting I somehow had misunderstood, and glad to see I had.
I have a very interesting piece I found some time ago titled, Jealousy and The Abyss which addresses similar notions, outside any specific context such as D/s. I have also come to grips with some of these issues myself recently and so found your posting particularly interesting.

Unknown said...

Greetings Mr. Cross,
This post was very interesting to me. Your thoughts have been well formed as usual.
In general, I believe that people make decisions in life from a position of faith (love) or fear. The corollary to this is that love and fear cannot exist at the same time.

If the decision made, either to share or not to share, is done from fear then it is a bad situation.

Alternatively, if the decision is made from a position of love and faith, then it is well taken, regardless of the call is to share or not to share.

(nice to see you back blogging, and apologies for not noticing earlier)

blessings,
felicia

Anonymous said...

Life is strange, I have a blogging website and in 2008 I posted a blog called the other side of jealousy, no relationship to your site just strange quinicidance. I may have some feedback that may be yours and vice versa.....

Cross Purposes via RSS. Subscribe now!

Lijit Search