Sunday, June 21, 2009

I get a negative comment

Greetings all,

I have always believed that one must pay as close attention to one's negative feedback, as one does to the positive.

The other day I received the following comments by an anonymous poster in reply to my entry on Cyberpaths, Narcissists, etc:

you are such an incredibly egotististical blowhard - if you really were so noble, you wouldn't even bother with this nonsense. but you issue your pronouncements to a small coterie of folks who follow you blindly and lap up the drivel you post like it was gospel. your ideas are a mishmosh of Gor, conventional D/s ideology and nonsense. you present yourself as an authority when you are no such thing - a 'published' author? give me a break!

and oh yes there ARE predators out there - such as you!

and no i will not give you my name since you obviously feel free to lambast anyone publicly and are not to be trusted.


Now some might be tempted to ignore such a comment. Others might be tempted to remove the post from their blog. Still others might waste a great deal of time and effort trying to figure out who the poster was. But these all seem like losing approaches. The best way to deal with such things, at least imo, is head on.

So, here is my reply:

Greetings Anonymous,

> you are such an incredibly egotististical blowhard

That I have a substantial ego goes without say, although I think the same might be said about every highly dominant person I know. It comes with the territory as far as I know. As to being a "blowhard" I think you are over-reaching. I do not post here often enough to qualify in that catagory. However, with respect to this particular issue, I certainly felt I had something that required saying.

Simply put, when I am attacked, I tend to fight back. And I was attacked.

> if you really were so noble, you wouldn't even bother with this nonsense.

Nobility has nothing to do with it. My name was being smeared, and I took umbrage with the remarks of others. In point of fact, I didn't bother with any of this nonsense until it came to my attention that someone else was rather "bothered" about me.

> but you issue your pronouncements to a small coterie of folks who follow you blindly and lap up the drivel you post like it was gospel.<

It is true that readership of my blog is on the small size. That is because I do nothing to promote it. It is here for those who wish to read it, and it can be easily left if anyone does not care for what I write. There are those who agree with me, and those who do not. And there are a few who may start thinking and trying to make up there mind one way or the other.

Of course, every now and then someone like yourself comes along, who leaves a negative comment, but really doesn't say why. There is nothing of substance in your comment. You do not point out a single sentence of mine which you feel qualifies as "drivel". Rather, you make a broad blanket statement. This strikes me as rather immature. If I have said something with which you take exception then point it out and let us debate. Otherwise, if the best you can do is lob these little verbal bomb shells with the hope of hitting something, well, it is really not the way grownups debate.

> your ideas are a mishmosh of Gor, conventional D/s ideology and nonsense. you present yourself as an authority when you are no such thing - a 'published' author? give me a break!<

Of course my ideas are a sythesis of all that I have read and know. Isn't that true for any thinking creature? Are we to blindly follow the ideology of a single way of thinking, or should we not be open to many points of view.

I have never said I was an authority. I am quite clear about that. My comments and viewed are based on my experiences and my thoughts.

As to being published, I am. You may have to search for me a bit, but I am there. Check for the books "He's on Top", "Enhanced" and "Garden of the Peverse".

> and oh yes there ARE predators out there - such as you

Really? How so? A rather serious allegation I should think. If I am a predator I certainly seem to be going about it in a rather strange way, don't you think? Do you have anyone particular in mind who I have been preying on? You know, I really don't mind people disagreeing with what I have to say, but leveling accusations like this is a rather serious matter, don't you think? Do you have any proof, any evidence?

How safe and secure you must feel within your cloak of annonymity. How curious that you choose to hide in secret and level accusations. I should mention, that by doing so you are not exactly making yourself so more credible.

> and no i will not give you my name since you obviously feel free to lambast anyone publicly and are not to be trusted.<

This is always your choice, however I take exception to being called untrustworthy. What is interesting is how you feel comfortable, coming to my blog, accusing me of being a predator, and untrustworthy (though I suppose that one might come with the other), yet you refuse to be held accountable for your own comments. Hardly what I would call proper behaviour.

I mean, really, are you not slightly ashamed to leave such a comment? Is this really the best you can come up with? Are you so insecure that you cannot even debate in cyberspace? Are you so lacking in self-esteem that you feel you couldn't stand up to mean old Mr. Cross in a debate? Your behavior reminds me of a child, who when unable to get their way, has a tantrum and calls people bad names. Is this really the impression you are trying to give? If you are, then it is working.

Be seeing you,

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"It is here for those who wish to read it, and it can be easily left if anyone does not care for what I right."

ppsst...that should be "write" rather than "right".

Good response, btw.

Mackenzie Cross said...

Greetings EponaEF,

Thanks very much for the comment and catching the typo. I really should have a proof-reader grafted onto me somehow.

Be seeing you,

Anonymous said...

having read your writings here and in other places, i must say that my impression is quite opposite. i find in your writings a wealth of intelligent, well-thought out and honest information and insight. you have have always given your opinion as only that. one just needs to count the number of "IMO" in your posts *smile*

i believe that while opinions and ideas vary greatly, there should always remain a basic protocol of courtesy and honor in any debate.
a worthy debate is one that can stand the light of scrutiny. sadly,
hiding behind anonymity, false accusations, and a dishonorable tone, this one is not so. it is hardly worth of your consideration. yet, as we have come to expect from you, your reply was direct, clear yet respectful.

i know that i now run the risk of being called part of your "coterie" - *smile* - but not blind is this following, rather one with much thought and appreciation.

take care,
rose

Mackenzie Cross said...

Greetings rose,

Thank you for your comments. They are much appreciated.

And yes, I do qualify most of what I was with a liberal sprinkling of IMOs!

I do agree with your points. It has always been my belief that honest debate will trump slander and false accusation. One can get a sense of this even in cyberspace.

As far as you being a member of my "gang", well, if you are the "rose" I think you are then I can't really imagine you being in anyone's gang but your own.

Be seeing you,

Hales said...

I see comments like this all the time in my profession. It's astounding the lengths people can go to to out someone but look ignorant in the way to choose to do so. I do not know you more than the few times we've spoken. However I can see a well informed intellect and well spoken Dom (was gonna say man but lol). Drivel or not is subjective to each person to read or ignore. Anon is meant to be used in other situations ones that require discretion for protection from harm or for protection of profession, those who for societal reasons cannot be themselves in the open. It isn't meant to hide behind a waspish tongue to vent and do so in a way that is not only crass but uninformative. Makes the aggressor lose credibility. Once that is gone the ears of the public close and we forget they even spoke. Brings to mind Mosquitoes being squashed by the ear.

So I will as always choose to form my own opinion on what I find to be sincere and ignore that of one such as your aggressor left you.

btw-great response and EponaEF might be a editor lol! I'd have said the same thing. Habit you know.

~Cia aka Hales

Cross Purposes via RSS. Subscribe now!

Lijit Search